Hospital Profitability in Pennsylvania: A 2014-2015 Update (1 of 2)

Is your hospital profitability suffering?  Is it being squeezed by a competitor? Or, is your hospital the one doing the squeezing?  Is it even making money?

As physicians we don’t often ask ourselves about the bigger organizational strategy.  However, it is hard to ignore the reality that hospital policies affecting us are often informed by numbers so hard to understand that sometimes we just pretend that logic doesn’t exist.

Maybe it’s time to do something about that.

Continue reading

Innovation – The Missing Link in Healthcare Quality?

Image credit: mindwerx.com

Fifteen years after the publication of Institute of Medicine’s landmark report To Err is Human, healthcare process improvement (PI) is finally beginning to take root.  Quality improvement (QI) has become a pillar of healthcare for both academic clinicians and private practice alike.

The workhorse of the Donebedian adage of “structure + process =  outcome” is on standardization.  In a world of static, well-defined products, proper application of PI can dramatically reduce variability.

While incremental improvement continues to be necessary in healthcare – we are a long way away from a six-sigma industry – continued standardization and scientific research alone are no longer sufficient to evolve healthcare.

Continue reading

The “Why” Question

When applying to residency, and perhaps to no one’s surprise, I always wanted to be asked during interview, “Why do you want to be a radiologist?” The “Why” question was an easy one to answer. After all, there was plenty to love about radiology – the challenge of solving a clinical diagnostic dilemma, the impact of catching an unsuspected Pancoast tumor, the satisfaction of revascularizing precious cerebral pneumbra. A better qualified medical student than I could discuss her scientific breakthrough, global health endeavor, and political leadership.

Change can unsettle even the best-prepared residents.

As medical students, we loved radiology for all the right reasons and wanted to talk about them. However, my generation of radiology trainees, the medical students who so eagerly entered this profession now grow concerned.

Indeed, my upper class colleagues were among the first to experience the radiology core exam. They were the first to experience the fourth year clinical concentration. They were the first to finish training not as board-certified radiologists, but board eligible. The changes do not end with training. No, the world we graduate residency into is brimming with uncertainty. My generation of radiologists will face evolving hiring trends, increasingly impersonal workflow, and dwindling Medicare reimbursement rates. We will be frontline soldiers in the ongoing battle between on-site radiologists and evolving teleradiology practices. We will comprise the proud new face of our profession, tasked to prove its value.

Change can unsettle even the best-prepared residents. I attended a recent Philadelphia Roentgen Ray Society meeting on the impact of the new American Board of Radiology examination changes followed by a panel discussion. Trainees and established radiologists filled the room, the air thick with uncertainty. I sat in the audience trying to absorb all the changes in the new ABR examination, the curricular changes in the final year of radiology, and the rippling effects they may have on the hiring process. Dazzled, I wondered how a modern radiology resident could expect to succeed when the metrics of success is a moving target. Eager for fresh air, I walked around the city before returning home.

Treading the paved urban sidewalk that evening, I walked past one of the new high-rise apartments in the city. When I began residency training three years ago, it was a construction site, little more than a steel frame wrapped in concrete. A year later, the building stood tall with large glass window panes, its lobby furnished with chiseled marble and glistening tiles. A little further to the east, a fresh construction site broke ground, born from the husk of an old store. Nascent city-sponsored self- service bicycle renting eased busy traffic, and pedestrians hurried past taxicabs in favor of rides hailed from the Internet.

Trainees who joined the profession looking for opportunities to improve care quality will find external change the best platform to introduce innovation.

Our world changes by the day, and it brings a nervous energy that is equal parts uncertainty and excitement. Practice change occurs at all levels in radiology, often for the better. Increasing awareness of radiation exposure in the public brought dose reduction techniques and dual energy systems into the forefront of CT research. The evolving reimbursement patterns fueled the American College of Radiology’s increasing emphasis on value-based imaging. Trainees who joined the profession looking for opportunities to improve care quality will find external change the best platform to introduce innovation.

Finally, some changes are frightening and some exciting, but parts of radiology simply have not changed at all. During a night shift several months ago a neurology resident asked me to review a head CT. The ordering provider did not see an abnormality but, “just wanted to be sure.” On a careful second perusal, a thin sheet of dense material revealed to be layering hemorrhage in the left middle cranial fossa, subtle but unmistakable when viewed from proper projection. The patient received close follow- up and the expanding hematoma expediently managed overnight.

The fulfillment of peering into a clinical problem to make an impact on a person’s life is a constant in radiology. In fact, so are most of those good answers that had compelled us to choose this profession in the first place. Perhaps therein lies the importance of asking ourselves the “Why” question. During this lengthy and rewarding training process, our answers to, “Why did I want to be a radiologist?” too will change. These answers form the compass as we wade through new uncharted waters. They give us the courage to sail ahead knowing the right direction, ready to tackle the thundering clouds that loom ahead.

I would not have a career any other way.

This post originally appeared in the January, 2015 Pennsylvania Radiology Society Newsletter.

Watson Will Replace Me? Not A Chance

Arthur C. Clark and Stanley Kubrick predicted supercomputers more intelligent than humans.  In 2001: A Space Odyssey, the HAL states, with typical human immodesty, “The 9000 series is the most reliable computer ever made… We are all, by any practical definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error.” Forty years later, IBM’s Watson pummeled humans in Jeopardy – a distinctly human game. Continue reading

When to Get Involved in Extracurricular Scholarly Work?

Starting a new residency is tough. With new opportunities come new challenges: balancing between learning a new discipline and getting involved in scholarly endeavors can be stressful in its own right.

A sound advice I heard as a first year resident was to hold off unnecessary involvement early during the residency. A free license to procrastinate.

However, procrastination implies a postponing of something inevitable, not to mention that research and quality improvement projects are parts of the residency requirement.

So the question remains, when does it make sense to get involved? And how? Continue reading

What Is the Radiology Personality?

What’s your radiology personality?

I recently ran into this thread on an online forum about an introverted medical student trying to choose a specialty. The thread referred to this book which contained a chapter declaring the “best-fit” specialty using Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). The types including radiology are as follows:

  • ISTP – Otolaryngology (ENT), Anesthesiology, Radiology, Ophthalmology, General practice
  • ESTP – Orthopedic surgery, Dermatology, Family practice, Radiology, General surgery
  • ENFJ – Thoracic surgery, Dermatology, Psychiatry, Ophthalmology, Radiology
  • ENTP – Otolaryngology (ENT), Psychiatry, Radiology, Pediatrics, Pathology

In the comments section, one astute contributor promptly posted the following… Continue reading

The Bliss of Zero

The clock hit 7pm. My thumb off the deadman switch on the dictaphone. The glow of the reading room workstation monitors reflected off my glasses. I squinted. A click of the mouse. A curious pause.

And then there it was. I saw…

Nothing. A worklist with zero unread exam.

Inbox zero, Epic Radiant variant.

Continue reading

Organizing OneNote to Rock Your Radiology Training

Radiology residents have a massive volume of information to keep track of in the discipline, consisting of texts, images, and sometimes videos.

The variety of data type is made more complex by the data sources, from website clippings, PDF from PubMed, a slide from noon conference, or simply freehand typing.

To complicate matters, a resident also must keep abreast many sets of requirements, documentations, conferences, reimbursements, and academic projects.

How do you keep track of it all? Continue reading

Opening Up – Adding Value to Your Open Source Project

This is the third of a series of three posts on open source software. The discussion is geared towards non-programmers who – more frequently than expected – becomes involved in an open-source project.

Open-source is a complex paradigm, but sometimes it is also thrown into an academic abstract or grant proposal without much thought. Previously I presented a basic description of open-source and discussed some common misconceptions about OS software.

If you were involved in an open-source project as the clinical expert (i.e. not the programmer), you are likely the team member best positioned to bridge this gap. This post focuses on how you are uniquely positioned to contribute. Continue reading

When IBM Watson Looks – Does It See Pictures or Patients?

This TV commercial caught my attention a few days ago.

In the TV spot, the narrator outlines the number of images a radiologist must parse through to find an abnormality. To help, IBM will teach its Watson “to see.”

Therein lies the problem: Seeing is not enough. Continue reading